Aurora AI by 極光有序有限公司
Inquiry email and attachments continue into candidate drawing search
When customer requirements are split across email, attachments, and a drawing repository, engineers must reread the request and search for possible historical drawings. Aurora brings the message and files into one task, then helps the team search and review candidate drawings in context.
How one inquiry moves forward
- Create a task from the email and engineering files
- Use request criteria to search for drawings
- Let an engineer confirm the candidate drawing
Four questions before introducing manufacturing AI
Which teams is this for?
Sales and engineering teams that repeatedly organize RFQ emails, check attachments, and search historical drawings. Start with one workflow whose inputs and deliverables can be verified before expanding.
What should we prepare?
Bring de-identified inquiry emails, attachments, and representative drawings. Identify the drawing-number source, approved revision, current search process, and reviewer. Include missing files, multiple revisions, and searches with no match.
How do we measure improvement?
Compare preparation and search time, correct candidate rate, manual corrections, and source traceability using the same samples. Engineers must confirm correctness; a completed task or successful download alone is not acceptance.
Do we need ERP or MES integration first?
Define the data to read, access permissions, and delivery destination first. Core-system connections, write-back, and automatic quoting require environment-specific assessment. The two recordings on this page show inquiry intake and candidate drawing search, not integration with every system.
Engineering-document workflow
Bring the inquiry email in and create a traceable task
Keep the message, sender context, and engineering files in one task so the full request stays with the work.
Organize the search criteria without rereading the entire email
Prepare item, specification, quantity, and drawing clues from the message and files for an engineer to review.
Retrieve candidate drawings and present possible results together
Search engineering data with confirmed criteria and return candidate drawings to the same working view.
Compare candidate drawings and let an engineer make the final call
A person reviews drawing content and search evidence before an uncertain result moves forward.
Return the search result to the task so the next person does not start over
The original email, engineering files, and confirmed drawing remain connected for replies, handoffs, and later searches.
Inquiry handling no longer starts by reconstructing engineering context
The request source, search criteria, and candidate drawings stay in one task so engineering and sales can continue from the same information.
A traceable inquiry task
Keep the original message, request details, and engineering files together with a clear source.
A candidate drawing list
Bring drawings that meet the criteria into one view instead of navigating folder by folder.
A human-confirmed search result
Keep the final selection connected to the request for replies, handoffs, and future retrieval.
Bring one inquiry and representative drawings to run the search flow
You do not need a complete specification first. Bring a de-identified inquiry email, engineering files, and the current drawing-search process so we can define which criteria and results must be retained.
Book an inquiry and drawing workflow review